Tiger Moms, Blossom Moms

Jan 26th, 2011

by Alexis Novak

If you want to know the secret to Asian students’ academic success and the downfall of Western parenting then pick up Amy Chua’s book “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother” wherein her answer for raising smart kids is to mercilessly ride their asses until they fear you enough to score straight A’s.  Or consider the actress formerly known as Blossom, Mayim Bialik, new Today Show Attachment Parenting Mommy blogger who requires extended breastfeeding, co-sleeping, home schooling and natural birthing if you truly love your children.

I wish there was a perfect mathematical equation to decent parenting that I could adopt, but I am highly suspicious of those who think they have the answer as Chua and Blossom claim.

First, Chua, a highly-educated law professor and mother of two is smug and relentlessly proud of her parenting model which she calls “Chinese parenting”.  Its sole goals are achievement, obedience and excellence through academics and music only.  Her daughters were never allowed extracurriculars like sports, sleepovers, and socializing in general. Ever.  They aren’t allowed to make their own choices or assert their independence.  Does her formula work academically?  Yes.  Her daughters are classically trained musicians, having been accepted into Pre-College Julliard programs, performing at Carnegie Hall and considered child prodigies.   If achievement is your idea of successful parenting then Chua is the expert and you should follow her advice accordingly.  Some things you will need to do to create children like hers: enforce daily mandatory 90 minute piano practice on kids under the age of 6, even after coming home from regular piano lessons.  While traveling abroad, force the kids to practice hours a day even if it means missing the Coliseum (isn’t this missing the point of traveling in the first place?).  Emphasize competition and being the absolute best in each class.  Is this stressing you out yet?

Chua criticizes Western parents for being indulgent, overly concerned about children’s self-esteem and allowing children to give up on themselves.  She preaches comparing siblings and pushing them to their breaking point because she always knows best.  An A- is a failure and should be punished accordingly.

I had to laugh out loud at her birthday dinner chapter when her children make crappy homemade birthday cards for her that she demands they remake because they aren’t crafted to the girls’ full potential.  She might have raised musically gifted perfectionists but there seems zero room for joy, spontaneity, or growth from screw-ups.  She admits about herself, “The truth is I’m not good at enjoying life. It’s not one of my strengths. I keep a lot of to-do lists and hate massages and Caribbean vacations. Florence (her mother-in-law) saw childhood as something fleeting to be enjoyed. I saw childhood as a training period, a time to build character and invest in the future” (Chua 97).  I am sure this zero-down time approach has produced two daughters with serious anxiety.  In fact, her second daughter rebelled so harshly against her at 13 that she was forced to take it down a notch.

I also couldn’t help but notice that though she clashes with her Mother-in-law’s parenting paradigm and criticizes this sophisticated, liberal, open-minded Jewish woman, her husband was equally as accomplished and maybe more so than Chua.  Husband Jed is also a law professor at an Ivy League school who briefly studied drama at Julliard.  And yet, when Jed’s mother asks Amy for one full day with each granddaughter to have unscheduled summer fun, Amy cannot say yes, thinking that one day off (from Chinese parenting) will hurt their music.  High expectations are essential but think her methods of never letting up and criticizing every aspect of her kids until the bitter (she claims successful) end is hardly the Holy Grail of parenting.  I also find her husband to be neither partner nor sidekick, more of an eerily silent afterthought.  He has no voice or vote in her dictatorship wherein Amy’s obsession with her children’s perfection possesses her every waking moment. I wondered about her own identity when the children leave home and she has no one to bark at and train anymore.  I guess that’s why she keeps adopting dogs.  She sees her children’s academic achievements as a direct result of her emotionally suffocating discipline.  They aren’t their own people, just clay to mold, who will never be able to make decisions for themselves.

Then, on the opposite side of the continuum, we have Attachment Parenting founded by Dr. William Sears.  Attachment Parenting has become a cultural phenomenon and its new poster child is Mayim Bialik.  The former actress who played spunky Blossom and now has a Ph. D.  parents using no time-outs and refuses to teach her kids manners like please and thank you.  Her book, “Intuitive Parenting”, isn’t out yet but I think I will pass on reading it.  Attachment Parenting works under the premise that babies are social creatures and need to be close to their parents through baby-wearing, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, home-schooling, gentle discipline and “elimination communication”.  How many women can breastfeed their children on demand, co-sleep with them at night and wear them all day?   Answer: moms who are out to win the gold medal in Motherhood Olympics so they can make the rest of us feel like shit.  Isn’t it healthy for both mother and child to detach sometimes?  I have trouble imagining how common sense moms could keep up these strict principles and what a failure they would feel like it they couldn’t.  I know because I failed at Attachment Parenting when I was unable to breastfeed and it made me feel awful.  Attachment Parenting’s answer was always to try harder.

My main issue with both Tiger Moms and Blossom Moms is that their theories prey upon mommy guilt, campaigning that the more (discipline or attachment) you give your children, the better they will turn out, at the expense of your own needs.  Like sacrificing a healthy relationship with your spouse.  Or sacrificing your sleep.  Or having your body to yourself for a minute.  I am over moms being told to give up more to make our children more.  In both of these models there is no such thing as healthy boundaries.  It’s crap.  Modern moms need to focus more on themselves to achieve balance.  Martyr Mothers are so out.

I am still searching for a common sense parenting book, one that doesn’t tell me I am not trying hard enough, so tell me if you find one.  If not, I may have to begin writing my own.

Related Posts

 
 

Written by Alexis Novak4 Comments

4 Responses to Tiger Moms, Blossom Moms

    Stacie Hummel Wed, Jan 26, 3:09pm

    Reply

    If you wrote one, I’d read it! You make more sense than 90% of the crap I’ve read online, via email, and in books. I think each child is different as is each family. There’s no need to be a Nazi about parenting and there’s also no need to have your child hanging off your breast half their life to be a good parent. Most of the information out there is crap; I’ve only been able to rely on my own common sense to tell me what my child needs and wants and I think as long as you do that you are a good parent.

    Shannon Wed, Jan 26, 10:15pm

    Reply

    As far as attachment parenting, I hold true to my number one motto in life- everything in moderation. There are definitely positives but to be 100 percent fully attached is a. setting you up for failure and b. not healthy for you, baby, or your marriage. And for Mrs. Chua? I pray that my children never give up life for obscene success. You only get one life, a life that should be spent deeply caring for others and finding what you love. Money, jobs, are important but so a far second in my book. I pity that poor delusional woman and those two girls whose lives she is stealing. Glad you read the book so I didn’t have to, because I don’t think I would have gotten very far through it before throwing it out the window.

    Courtney Thu, Jan 27, 11:38am

    Reply

    Like Shannon, I’m glad you read it so I don’t have to! I hope Chua is deliberately being extreme in her book to get attention and she is not that bad in real life, because if she is, I feel sorry for her daughters. They only get to be kids once — when do they get to have fun and use their imaginations? Shouldn’t they get to try different things without worrying that they’ll fail at them? I don’t have a problem with some of her ideas in general about working hard and that there are times when the kids will have to do things they don’t want to. But cut them some slack!
    As for Mayim, yeah, that’s the other extreme. She has some good points, too, but there’s also nothing wrong as a mom with taking some time to yourself and setting limits. I also wonder about how you gradually separate because you’ll inevitably have to. Thanks for your post!

    Running Betty Fri, Feb 4, 10:43am

    Reply

    I’m happy to write one with you. My kids go to school, go to sleepovers (since age 4 I think), have birthday parties, quit orchestra to run track, and sleep in their own beds.
    But they also eat right, get a good night’s sleep, study, do their laundry, and have respect for feelings.

    I have this little theory that part of my happiness at home involves a happy marriage, and that does NOT involve cosleeping. It does, however, involve private space for me to bond with my husband, and when we’re lucky, sex.
    And breast is best, but if you work full time while wearing a suit, stopping to pump is not ideal. Some of us were not child stars and thus have to work full time, Blossom.

    Perhaps my children will be better prepared for Harvard if they had a Chinese mother, but my children are well prepared for the real world and real relationships – while maintaining great grades and fun hobbies.

    I believe in strengthening each child’s strengths, and that is too personal & individual to fit on the pages of one book.

    Ask that Chinese mom how content and happy she is. Because I have one he!! of a smile on my face.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>